Philosophy is such a discipline that has no universally accepted form of definition and it is approached in many different ways. This was probably why Aristotle said that “philosophy began in wonder”, for an individual like Karl Marx, he said “philosophy is the unity of theory and practice”, whereas, for J. I. Omoregbe, “to philosophize is to reflect on human experiences in search of answers to some fundamental questions”, and therefore, “philosophy is essentially a reflective activity”. However, philosophy and its subject-matters are universal issues that are applicable everywhere irrespective of race or creed, but this does not mean that all subject-matters of philosophy are addressed by all philosophers at all places. For instance, western philosophers treat the issues of Metaphysics and wisdom in general, while oriental philosophy has its main-stay in Aesthetics and Arab philosophy concern itself majorly with religion and the nature cum composition of man. Nevertheless, there are specific factors that I find common to all forms of philosophy; that they seek to understand man and his relationship with the universe, and to find a way of making this relationship better in favour of man, and in the process, not causing harm to the moral universe. All these are then achieved through a process of reflective, critical and analytic thinking.
But amidst the present academic world order, the controversy for and against the existence of African philosophy has lingered for decades. It has been argued that Africans had no civilization before the coming of Europeans, so there was no civilized society to organize and consequently, no need for philosophy. This argument is easily debased as history has shown that civilization began in Africa as far back as 3000 B. C in ancient Egypt which later translated into other African societies in the Maghreb, the Sudan, the horn of Africa and further into the interior. Likewise, the colonizing Europeans met Africans governing themselves in organized groups under their various forms of socio-political structure and philosophy.
For the fact that Africa, south of the Sahara, was predominantly a non-writing culture, non-African scholars claimed that it was impossible for philosophy to have been done in such a situation because, to them, that was the only means of preserving and transmitting philosophical thoughts and ideas. On the contrary, it may be true that a lot of African nations did not have a standard way of expressing themselves through writing, but writing is not the whole stock of philosophy, it is just one of many ways to communicate philosophy. Whereas, in the unique nature of African philosophy, there are many other ways in which it was developed, communicated and preserved, and these ways range from the African governmental institutions, the various forms of ceremonies, proverbial sayings, folk tales and the likes. Therefore, to infer the absence of philosophy from the absence of standard writing codes is indeed fallacious and absolutely baseless.
Also, there is an argument that African philosophy cannot be because what are been referred to as ‘African Philosophy’ are not classified by Africans into the branches of Epistemology, Logic, Metaphysics, Ethics and so on, so it makes distinction in African thought difficult, and studying them, more difficult. But considering this argument, I would like to ask a set of questions; must African reflective activities be patterned after the western style before they can become philosophy? Certainly not! Reflection is fundamental to philosophy and not classification, and this reflection is a common phenomenon to all men. In fact, who set those classification standards? On what basis? Can they be consistently universal, reliable and applicable at all times? This is just like the imposition of the western system of government on Africa. Truly, the western form of government evidently works for them but here in Africa, it has proven to be a colossal failure in most places. Then casting African philosophy into the mold of “westernism” could also prove fatal, both for scholars and Africa at large. African philosophy need not follow an established foreign pattern before it can be, it has a right of uniqueness.
Another argument brought forward by those opposing the existence of African philosophy is that unlike some other parts of the world, African philosophy is not ascribed to individuals. We have heard and read of the Socratic philosophy, Hegelian philosophy, Marxist philosophy, Confucian philosophy and their likes, so, Africans have been asked; who and where are your philosophers if really there is an African philosophy? The reasons for the absence of ancient individual philosophers on the African scene are very simple. First, it has been said that African thoughts and philosophies were transmitted and preserved through memory and words of mouth, and through this method, there was no room for preserving the names of individual thinkers. Again, those using the personality criterion to judge African philosophy have failed to take the differences in the societies into account. While most other parts of the world were individualistic and personalities stood-out, Africa was possessively, or in a softer language, predominantly communalistic. It was easy to ascribe philosophies of Plato and Russell to them because in their times and countries, every man lived almost entirely for himself and was wholly responsible for his actions and inactions. But examine the situation of my grand-father and his predecessors who all lived among other family members in a village or town where everyone was inter-related, they lived, owned and did almost everything together. Against this background, we can see why properties—material, intellectual and otherwise—are considered as community properties and not that of individuals. The result and evidence of this is that, for instance, Yoruba proverbs are preceded by statements such as “awon agba wi pe…”(the elders say…) or “Yoruba wi pe”(Yoruba says). Nevertheless, these thoughts and philosophies necessarily originated from specific individuals since two people cannot do one thinking. Then I would say that the ancient African philosophers are the unknown egalitarian men and women who deployed their reflective and intellectual capacities to promote unity and faith among Africans.
I hereby assert that African philosophy is a reflective and intellectual activity and the world view of Africans about their natural cum spiritual environment. It is also the doctrinal and conceptual analysis of issues and the thought of Africans as pertaining to the African life and society. Every society that existed, exists and will later exist did, does and will do so on the foundation of a number of policies. This policies will help to consolidate the powers of the authorities and harmonize the people towards a specific goal(internal policies), as well as determine relationship with other societies(foreign policies), and these are in turn determined by the prominent philosophies of that society. Africa was not left out of this world order as every society in the continent inter-related in terms of commerce, culture, conflict, religion, marriage and many more. This shows that Africans were truly organized, this organization was based on principles of philosophical orientation. Therefore, Africa has her own home-grown philosophies and these philosophies are inter-woven with the religion, government and indeed, the whole set-up of the African life.